• Español

Since the media jumped on this issue of Iñaqui Urdangarín, What bothered me most was not that he has put money in his pocket, or not. Until untested. Nor am I concerned about the amount. Neither the small detail that he has used, or not,  NGOs as a protective screen of these alleged actions, even to prove. What bothered me most was the stupidity. Because assuming everything has been said in the press may be true, if only partly, or not. I think  must be very stupid or impossibly ambitious,to threaten a privileged position like his for a few million. No offense to anyone, but I think you have to be very foolish to miss the chance to live like a rajah with little effort. The very monarchical, I know some will say:

Privilege not nothing, that they all work.

Ha! work is another matter.  What happens is that if you have never worked, it can be difficult to understand the concept of “work”, leading to error.

Having a paid job at some big company, lacking content, without time obligations or responsibilities that is not working, that’s a cushy job. One of the traditional ways to access a cushy job is marriage for money,not necessary for money (pop. in spanish “braguetazo”)

Since immemorial  time, marriage for money has been a mainstay of monarchies. Sometimes  these marriages work well, such as the Prince of Edinburgh, Queen Elizabeth husband, who has maintained a perfect balance between his  social position and  his recreational activities.  At the other end and whithout leaving Great Britain, we would meet, for example, Anne Boleyn which  marriage caused a terrible headache

Maybe someday we will know the truth about Urdangarín, or not. Because always remain a doubt. This will not happen to his brother-in-law Don Jaime de Marichalar. Don Jaime has played his cards and his handkerchiefs better.

I have not the pleasure or displeasure of knowing him personally, but if my son-in-law dresses that way, I would not have gone to the wedding

What happened this Easter in Soria with his gun and his son Froilan? I do not know or care. But if this happens to me, I’m sure as I get to the hospital with the child, the policecome to me and then try to clarify the matter.

These things induce meditation.

What, perhaps over the years we all become a little silly? Do I have to explain majesty,t hat the prospect of having, in the distant future, your son Don Felipe  as king, is something most of  Spanish people not just digest? Do I have to explain Majesty, that  in this country there are many more Republicans than monarchical?   Do I have to explain Majesty, to be monarchical in ot the same  to be “John Carlist”?

Although I believe much in that of “pushed by the elements or circumstances.” I do notdeny that during the transition many things happened and some voluntarily or not, you had a major role in us not we fought.

Unfortunately those who today are 45 years or less, no longer have a direct and personal memories of that historic stage. To them you are an older gentleman wholives in a palace surrounded by people who do not work ”live the story.”
People who spend their lives for dinner at dinner, with the cost of clothing shoes and evening bags that means. When they go down the street as “normal people” they do it surrounded by police it costs a pretty penny. When they go on vacation they do not have to search hotel, they have palaces. When they go to football, concert, opera or wherever they please (which for that matter) they do not have to worry about tickets. Probably They  did not know the price of a coffee because there’s always an asshole who pays for it.

But nevertheless, your majesty, I am willing to forgive almost anything. But what I can never forgive is this stupidity.

But what were you thinking about, Majesty?. If  you thought about something, of course.